Instead of `Pleroma.User.all_superusers()` we now use `Pleroma.User.all_superusers(:report_handle)`
I also changed it for sending emails, but there were no tests.
This should eventually replace the Pleroma.User.all_superusers/0 function
* I added a new param `is_privileged` in User.query
* Now we can fetch all users with a specified privilege
Before we deleted the notifications, but that was a side effect and didn't always trigger any more.
Now we just hide them when an unprivileged user asks them.
This reverts commit 89667189b8 and cdc5bbe836.
This is a side effect when changing user role.
The goal was to not have report notifications when someone isn't admin or moderator any more.
But this won't be triggered when we change the privilege tags for a role, so we can't use this sollution any more.
There was another solution to filter out report notifications during fetch.
It wasn't merged because this seemed 'cleaner' at the time, but now it seems the better sollution.
I'll add it in the next commit.
I still had three endpoints I didn't really know what to do with them. I added them under separate tags
* :instance_delete
* :moderation_log_read
* :stats_read
I also checked and these are the last changes done by MR https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/3480/diffs this is trying to fix
One of the things we do during the tests is change the config. But that's global state and different tests were interfering.
E.g. one test would set `clear_config([:instance, :admin_privileges], [:statuses_read])`, but while that runs, another test may
do `clear_config([:instance, :admin_privileges], [:user_invite])`. Now the code for the first test checks the setting, and it
finds `:user_invite` instead of `:statuses_read`.
Now the modules where this happens are marked to run synchronously, so they don't interfere with each other.
* rejected_shortcodes is defined as a list of strings in the
configuration description. As such, database-based configuration was
led to handle those settings as strings, and not as the actually
expected type, Regex.
* This caused each message passing through this MRF, if a rejected
shortcode was set and the emoji did not exist already on the instance,
to fail federating, as an exception was raised, swiftly caught and
mostly silenced.
* This commit fixes the issue by introducing new behavior: strings are
now handled as perfect matches for an emoji shortcode (meaning that if
the emoji-to-be-pulled's shortcode is in the blacklist, it will be
rejected), while still supporting Regex types as before.
It retrieved two ReportNotes and then checked one of them. But the order isn't guaranteed, while the test tested on the content of the first ReportNote.
I made the test on the content more generic
When someone isn't a superuser any more, they shouldn't see the reporsts any more either.
Here we delete the report notifications from a user when that user gets updated from being a superuser to a non-superuser.
elixir gettext current does not fully support fallback to another language [0].
But it might in the future. We adapt it so that all languages in Accept-Language
headers are received by Pleroma.Web.Gettext. User.languages is now a comma-separated
list.
[0]: https://github.com/elixir-gettext/gettext/issues/303
For an example, here, zh is not supported, but zh_Hans and zh_Hant
are. If the user asks for zh, we should choose a variant for them
instead of fallbacking to default.
Some browsers (e.g. Firefox) does not allow users to customize
their language codes. For example, there is no zh-Hans, but only
zh, zh-CN, zh-TW, zh-HK, etc. This provides a workaround for
those users suffering from bad design decisions.
For some reason I had a test who suddenly failed, mix test test/pleroma/web/o_auth/app_test.exs:54. A user has a list of applications and this test adds them and then sees if the list it gets back is the same as the apps it added.
When I ran mix test a day before I didn't have this problem and when I pushed code today in a different MR, the pipeline succeeded (see https://git.pleroma.social/ilja/pleroma/-/jobs/205827), yet locally it failed. So it seems the test can sometimes succeed and sometimes fail, which makes it untrustworthy.
The failure I see is because the returned list is in reverse order. I assume that's not per sé wrong. You just want to know if the apps you added are actually there. I fixed the test by first ordering the lists before comparing.
AFAICT (and as far as that's relevant) the test got introduced in commit cb2a072e62
